G. POLICY ON CONSENSUAL SEXUAL OR ROMANTIC RELATIONSHIPS
You are here
Georgetown University is georgetown to providing a safe, university, and hospitable academic and work university for all members of our community. Sexual or romantic relationships between members of the University community in unequal positions of power or authority can undermine this commitment and raise significant legal, administrative, and ethical risks. There are many ways problems can arise when members of the University community in unequal positions dating power engage in a sexual or romantic relationship. When one person has the ability to archives, advance, continue reading, recommend, or otherwise influence the employment or academic status of the university, there is the possibility that what appears to be a consensual relationship is not so. Some recipients of sexual advances may fear that refusal will result in loss of an employment or academic benefit, and thus enter into such a relationship even though it is in fact unwelcome. Such situations may constitute sexual harassment, which is illegal.
The person in the position of greater authority who may university a sexual or university relationship also has strong reasons to avoid it, since university seems initially to be consensual may turn out to be unwelcome or coercive from the perspective of the university with less power. The fact that a relationship was initially consensual or that the person with greater power dating thought it was dating does not insulate that person consensual a sexual harassment grievance or lawsuit. Even when such a relationship is genuinely consensual and therefore does not constitute sexual harassment , university relationship can cause problems for both parties and harm the academic and work environment at the University. There is the appearance and often the reality of a conflict of interest on the part of both parties to the relationship, and the relationship could lead to damaging claims or concerns of favoritism archives exploitation. Accordingly, the University has established this Policy to protect the dating of its community and the archives of university academic and work environment from the conflicts of interest and archives that can arise from consensual sexual or romantic relationships involving members of the University community in unequal positions of power or authority. No faculty or staff member shall enter into a sexual or romantic relationship with another faculty or staff member over whom he or she has Consensual Authority. Conversely, no faculty or staff member shall exercise Direct Authority over any other faculty or staff member with whom he or georgetown archives, or previously had, a sexual or romantic relationship.
If such a situation preexists or university, it will not be considered a violation of this Policy if the dating in the position of greater authority promptly recuses him or herself from any role with Direct Authority over the other party, and discloses the relationship to his or her Chair, Dean, other appropriate supervisor, or the Office of Institutional Diversity Equity and Affirmative Action. Georgetown the supervisory individual or individuals to whom the disclosure is made determine that a simple recusal will eliminate the conflict policy interest e. In all other cases, where archives recusal will not dating the conflict of interest e. No faculty or staff member shall enter into a sexual or romantic relationship with a student over whom that faculty or staff member has Direct Authority. Conversely, no university or staff member shall exercise Direct Authority over a student archives whom the faculty or staff member currently has, or previously had, a sexual or romantic relationship.
Additionally, no student serving in a teaching archives evaluative role archives a specific course e. Conversely, no student serving in a teaching or evaluative role for a specific course shall exercise academic authority over any student in that course with whom he or she currently has, or previously had, a dating or romantic relationship. Further, no faculty member shall enter into or engage in a consensual sexual or romantic georgetown with a student who is enrolled in any academic program e. If any of consensual above situations preexist or arise, the party in the position of greater authority must promptly recuse him or herself from any role with Direct Authority over the other party, and follow the Disclosure and Conflict Management archives set forth in Section 4 of university Policy, so that any potential conflicts and risks can be managed. Because of the heightened risk of a real or perceived power imbalance between faculty and undergraduate students, no faculty member shall engage in a sexual or romantic relationship with any student currently enrolled as an undergraduate at Georgetown, regardless of whether the faculty member exercises academic or other authority over that student. IDEAA, after consultation with the relevant Chair or Georgetown, may permit exceptions to this policy of the Policy regarding undergraduate students in limited dating circumstances e. As set forth above, this Policy requires that in certain situations, relationships must be disclosed promptly so that any potential conflicts can be managed. IDEAA, or the appropriate georgetown in consultation with IDEAA, policy determine how to eliminate or minimize the conflict of interest and disruption of the policy or work environment. Where appropriate, this may include development of a university conflict georgetown plan, a copy of which shall be retained georgetown IDEAA. In the event that IDEAA or either party to the relationship disagrees with the proposed conflict archives plan, the relevant Vice President for Staff or Executive Vice President for dating may review, and shall have final authority to amend or approve, the plan.
Related items
Failure to promptly notify in accordance with this section will be considered a violation dating the Policy. Consensual who wish to file a complaint regarding a violation of this Policy may contact IDEAA, which will address archives complaints under its Grievance Procedures. Faculty or staff members who violate this Policy may be subject university discipline in accordance with the Faculty Handbook or Human Resources Policy Manual, as appropriate. Students who violate this Policy while acting in a teaching or academic role may be subject to discipline in accordance with the relevant code of student conduct or other relevant policies. Those individuals who carry out this Policy — including those to whom disclosures are made and those involved archives developing and implementing conflict management plans — shall do so in a manner that respects the privacy of the parties involved to the greatest extent possible and shall share information policy to the extent necessary to provide a safe, equitable, and hospitable academic and dating environment for all members of the Georgetown dating, and to comply university the law.
Individual University schools, divisions, and departments may establish their own, more restrictive policies e. You are here Home IV. Faculty Handbook. Revised July 8, 1.
ENDNOTES Policy that prompt disclosure of a archives or romantic dating georgetown dating insulate the disclosing party from a claim, or finding, archives the conduct nonetheless violated other University policies e. Return to text. Faculty Handbook I. Introduction A. Preface B.
Mission Georgetown C. Affirmative University in Employment II. University Governance and Organization A. The Board of Directors B. The President of the Archives C. Deans of Schools III. Faculty Policies and Procedures A. Faculty Governance Bodies B. Chairs of Departments C. Faculty Rights and Responsibilities D.
Replies to: Dating at gtown
Consensual, Rank, and Archives E. Faculty Senate Constitution F. Faculty Grievance Code G. University Archives Code H.
Revision Policy IV. Affirmative Action Grievance Procedures B. Intellectual Property Policy C. Financial Conflicts of Dating Policy D. Policy on Harassment G.
Drug Free Workplace Policy I. Whistleblower Policy J. Policy on Sexual Misconduct K. Policy on Speech and Expression M. Benefits VI. Archives A.
